Skip to content
Legalonus

Legalonus

Acpuitas sequitur legam

  • Current Affairs
  • Legal Articles
  • Legal Maxim
  • Legal News
  • News
  • About us.
  • Call for Blogs
  • Official Legalonus WhatsApp Group “Legalonus Community” join now!
  • Editorial Board Page
  • Editorial Board Profile
  • Profile
  • Volume I Issue I (2022)
  • en English
    ar Arabicbn Bengalizh-CN Chinese (Simplified)cs Czechda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfr Frenchde Germangu Gujaratihi Hindiit Italianla Latinmr Marathine Nepalipt Portuguesepa Punjabiru Russiansd Sindhies Spanish
  • Toggle search form
  • Project Lion: Gujarat seeks Rs. 2,000 crores from Central Government Current Affairs
  • OFFENCES RELATING TO MARRIAGES Articles
  • National Fish Farmers’ Day: 10 July Current Affairs
  • ARMED FORCES (SPECIAL POWERS) ACT (AFSPA), 1958 “AFSPA” Articles
  • Independence Day 2021: 4 Fascinating Facts You Need to Know! Current Affairs
  • Drones not permitted to fly within 25km of international borders including LOC, LAC: Civil Aviation Ministry Legal News
  • Kerala CM announces Educational Empowerment Fund – All you need to know Current Affairs
  • LAW GLOBAL is organizing a 2 day Webinar on Certified course on Company Act, 2013 and Amendment Section

Bombay HC Stays Two Provisions of IT Rules, Says They Prima Facie Violate Freedom of Speech

Posted on August 15, 2021August 15, 2021 By Ayush No Comments on Bombay HC Stays Two Provisions of IT Rules, Says They Prima Facie Violate Freedom of Speech

The Bombay high court on Saturday stayed two provisions of the new IT Rules – rules 9(1) and 9(3) – which say that digital news media and publishers should adhere to the ‘Code of Ethics laid out in the rules.

The court was trying petitions filed by The Leaflet and Nikhil Wagle against the new rules. The bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice G.S. Kulkarni, though, looked out that the relief was only relevant to the two petitioners in question.

JOIN US ON TELEGRAM

The rules being stayed, the high court noted, prima facie violate the right to freedom of speech under Article 19 of the constitution and also went against the IT Act, under which the new rules were formed.

“In so far as Rule 9 is involved, we have discovered it prima facie to be an invasion of the petitioner’s rights under Article 19(1)(a). We have also believed that it goes beyond the substantive law. Hence we have stayed clauses 9(1) and 9(3). The rule does not stay in its totality,” the bench said in court, according to LiveLaw. The full order is not yet available.

The bench, but, declined to stay rules 14 and 16, which too the petitioners had stated conflict with. Rule 14 deals with the creation of an inter-departmental committee as an oversight tool over digital media. Since no such committee has been established yet, the high court said there is no “immediate urgency” to deal with the matter.
Rule 16 gives the Union government power to prevent access to published material. The bench said similar provisions also exist in the 2009 Intermediary Rules, and the petitioners had not questioned those.

On Friday, the bench had maintained its order in the matter but questioned the government on the necessity to include new rules in the first place.
The petitions filed by The Leaflet and Wagle are among a slew of petitions filed by various media organisations in high courts across the country, claiming that the new IT rules infringe both the constitution and the IT Act, which they were constructed under. The first such plea was filed by The Wire, its founding editor M.K. Venu and The News Minute editor Dhanya Rajendran.

Spread the love
Legal News Tags:ombay HC Stays Two Provisions of IT Rules, Says They Prima Facie Violate Freedom of Speech

Post navigation

Previous Post: Independence Day 2021: Nations that celebrate Independence Day on August 15
Next Post: Lack of quality debate in Parliament while formulating laws: CJI NV Ramana

Related Posts

  • Delhi High Court restricts Netflix, CNA from the broadcasting documentary “A Big Little Murder” Legal News
  • Custodial violence a concern for civilized society: Allahabad High Court denies bail to ex-policeman accused of custodial death Legal News
  • “You make laws instantly, you can rush through the impact of laws too:” SC grants Central govt 4 weeks to consider impact of Consumer Protection Act 2019 Legal News
  • National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management Bill passed: All you need to know Legal News
  • Quasi-Judicial Powers Can’t Be Delegated; One Who Decides Must Hear: Karnataka High Court Legal News
  • Delhi High Court asks response from Central govt, Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights on plea to eradicate child begging Legal News

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

July 2022
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Jun    
subscribeSubscribe to my channel
«
Prev
1
/
3
Next
»
loading
play
Honorable High Court of Karnataka verdict on HIJAB issue. #viral #shorts #judiciary #law #caselaws
play
Section 6 of Indian evidence act concept based question Res Gestae #shorts #viral #youtubeshorts
play
Difference between rule of relevancy and rule of admissibility. understand the difference in 1 min.
play
can a examination of witnesses be done through video conferencing? #viral #youtubeshorts
play
Last Seen Theory under Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Understand the concept in 27 seconds!
play
Concept of Successive Bail. #viral #caselaws #judiciary #law #pcsj #legalknowledge
«
Prev
1
/
3
Next
»
loading

  • What is the Fourth Pillar of Democracy? Articles
  • What is Essential Defence Services Bill? Legal News
  • DATA PROTECTION BILL Articles
  • MEANING OF ALIBI: ALIBI AS A DEFENCE Articles
  • 2022 Khelo India Youth Games to be organised in Haryana Current Affairs
  • Abrogation of Article 370 and 35A Articles
  • Golden Boot won by Portugal captain Cristiano Ronaldo Current Affairs
  • Vox emissa volat, litera soripta manet Legal Maxim

Recent Posts

  • ANALYSIS OF MOTOR LAWS IN INDIA
  • SECULARISM IN INDIA – BINARY EFFECT WITH JUDICIARY & CONSTITUTION
  • SCHOOLS OF CRIMINOLOGY
  • CASE ANALYSIS: U. UNICHOYI AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF KERALA
  • RUSSIA-UKRAINE CONFLICT – WHAT IT SIGNIFIES FOR TAIWAN’S FUTURE

About us

  • About us.
  • Contact
  • Current Affairs
  • Editorial Board Page
  • Editorial Board Profile
  • Legal Articles
  • Legal Maxim
  • Legal News
  • News
  • Official Legalonus WhatsApp Group “Legalonus Community” join now!
  • Profile
  • Volume I Issue I (2022)

Choose Language

en English
ar Arabicbn Bengalizh-CN Chinese (Simplified)cs Czechda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfr Frenchde Germangu Gujaratihi Hindiit Italianla Latinmr Marathine Nepalipt Portuguesepa Punjabiru Russiansd Sindhies Spanish

Copyright © 2022 Legalonus.

Powered by PressBook News WordPress theme