Skip to content
Legalonus

Legalonus

Acpuitas sequitur legam

  • Current Affairs
  • Legal Articles
  • Legal Maxim
  • Legal News
  • News
  • About us.
  • Call for Blogs
  • Official Legalonus WhatsApp Group “Legalonus Community” join now!
  • Editorial Board Page
  • Editorial Board Profile
  • Profile
  • Volume I Issue I (2022)
  • en English
    ar Arabicbn Bengalizh-CN Chinese (Simplified)cs Czechda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfr Frenchde Germangu Gujaratihi Hindiit Italianla Latinmr Marathine Nepalipt Portuguesepa Punjabiru Russiansd Sindhies Spanish
  • Toggle search form
  • ACCESS TO JUSTICE DURING LOCKDOWN Articles
  • A cow should be named as National Animal: Allahabad High Court Legal News
  • SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE Articles
  • Rights of an Arrested Person Articles
  • List of Indian track and field athletes qualified for Tokyo Olympics 2020 from India Current Affairs
  • THE EFFECT OF MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS ON THE GROWTH OF A COMPANY Articles
  • Myanmar: Arrest of Aung San Suu Kyi and the Fall of Democracy Articles
  • ANALYSIS OF COAL PROBLEMS IN INDIA Articles

Centre to amend Income Tax Act, no provision for retrospective tax

Posted on August 5, 2021August 5, 2021 By Ayush No Comments on Centre to amend Income Tax Act, no provision for retrospective tax

The Centre on Thursday presented the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill to lead closure to the retrospective income tax law which was begun in 2012. Once the amendments are established, there will be no event like that of Cairn energy or Vodafone that may take place.

The finance ministry said in a statement

JOIN US ON TELEGRAM

“The Bill aims to improve the Income-tax Act, 1961 so as to present that no tax demand shall be established in future on the base of the said retrospective amendment for any indirect transfer of Indian assets if the transaction was initiated before 28th May 2012 (i.e., the date on which the Finance Bill, 2012 received the assent of the President),”

The government stated

“It is moreover intended to present that the demand boosted for indirect transfer of Indian assets made before 28th May 2012 shall be repealed on the satisfaction of specified requirements such as removal or furnishing of undertaking for withdrawal of pending case and furnishing of an undertaking to the effect that no requirement for cost, damages, interest, etc., shall be registered. It is also offered to return the amount paid in these cases without any interest thereon,”
1202021lse-398025Download

THE TAXATION LAWS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2021

Spread the love
Legal News Tags:2021, THE TAXATION LAWS (AMENDMENT) BILL

Post navigation

Previous Post: Kerala CM announces Educational Empowerment Fund – All you need to know
Next Post: Security should not be provided merely to enhance one’s status: Allahabad High Court

Related Posts

  • Whether the Commercial court can Consider the Lawsuit for the Restoration of Possession filed after the terminus of the Tenancy? Check Apex Court’s opinion Legal News
  • The government recommends amendments to Forest Conservation Act; Know why Current Affairs
  • Threat To Human Rights & Bodily Integrity Highest At Police Stations: CJI NV Ramana Legal News
  • New Health Law Draft Bill: Remaking of Epidemic Diseases Act of 1897 as Public Health (Prevention, Control, and Management of Epidemics, Bio-terrorism, and Disasters) Act, 2017. Current Affairs
  • Magistrate Not Needed To Record Statement Of Public Servant Who Filed Complaint Before Summoning Accused: Supreme Court Legal News
  • Police questioning school kids in sedition case violated rights: K’taka HC Legal News

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

June 2022
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« May    
subscribeSubscribe to my channel
«
Prev
1
/
3
Next
»
loading
play
Honorable High Court of Karnataka verdict on HIJAB issue. #viral #shorts #judiciary #law #caselaws
play
Section 6 of Indian evidence act concept based question Res Gestae #shorts #viral #youtubeshorts
play
Difference between rule of relevancy and rule of admissibility. understand the difference in 1 min.
play
can a examination of witnesses be done through video conferencing? #viral #youtubeshorts
play
Last Seen Theory under Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Understand the concept in 27 seconds!
play
Concept of Successive Bail. #viral #caselaws #judiciary #law #pcsj #legalknowledge
«
Prev
1
/
3
Next
»
loading

  • Trade War – China and USA Articles
  • Analysis of Q1 GDP Growth in FY 2021-22 Articles
  • NEED FOR REPLACEMENT OF CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT- CRITICAL ANALYSIS Articles
  • Nemo in Propria causa- Judrex esse debet Legal Maxim
  • Why is Discrimination against women Increasing? Articles
  • Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea Legal Maxim
  • US giant automaker: Why is Ford ceasing production and its hit on workers and customers? Articles
  • Hijab Ban Constitutional! Says High Court. Legal News

Recent Posts

  • ANALYSIS OF MOTOR LAWS IN INDIA
  • SECULARISM IN INDIA – BINARY EFFECT WITH JUDICIARY & CONSTITUTION
  • SCHOOLS OF CRIMINOLOGY
  • CASE ANALYSIS: U. UNICHOYI AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF KERALA
  • RUSSIA-UKRAINE CONFLICT – WHAT IT SIGNIFIES FOR TAIWAN’S FUTURE

About us

  • About us.
  • Contact
  • Current Affairs
  • Editorial Board Page
  • Editorial Board Profile
  • Legal Articles
  • Legal Maxim
  • Legal News
  • News
  • Official Legalonus WhatsApp Group “Legalonus Community” join now!
  • Profile
  • Volume I Issue I (2022)

Choose Language

en English
ar Arabicbn Bengalizh-CN Chinese (Simplified)cs Czechda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfr Frenchde Germangu Gujaratihi Hindiit Italianla Latinmr Marathine Nepalipt Portuguesepa Punjabiru Russiansd Sindhies Spanish

Copyright © 2022 Legalonus.

Powered by PressBook News WordPress theme