Skip to content
Legalonus

Legalonus

Acpuitas sequitur legam

  • Current Affairs
  • Legal Articles
  • Legal Maxim
  • Legal News
  • News
  • About us.
  • Call for Blogs
  • Official Legalonus WhatsApp Group “Legalonus Community” join now!
  • Editorial Board Page
  • Editorial Board Profile
  • Profile
  • Volume I Issue I (2022)
  • en English
    ar Arabicbn Bengalizh-CN Chinese (Simplified)cs Czechda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfr Frenchde Germangu Gujaratihi Hindiit Italianla Latinmr Marathine Nepalipt Portuguesepa Punjabiru Russiansd Sindhies Spanish
  • Toggle search form
  • ICC Player of the Month Award goes to Sophie Ecclestone, Devon Conway Current Affairs
  • e-RUPI: PM Modi to start digital payment solution on August 2nd Current Affairs
  • UKRAINE VS RUSSIA: THE NEVER-ENDING WAR? Articles
  • ANALYSIS OF LAKSHADWEEP PANCHAYAT REGULATION, 2021: IN TERMS OF TWO CHILD POLICY Articles
  • National Legal Service Day Articles
  • Assentio mentium Legal Maxim
  • DOCTRINE OF RES GESTA Articles
  • Trade War – China and USA Articles

[Challenge to IT Rules 2021] “What is this:” Madras High Court pulls up Central govt for delay in filing the response

Posted on August 11, 2021August 11, 2021 By Ayush No Comments on [Challenge to IT Rules 2021] “What is this:” Madras High Court pulls up Central govt for delay in filing the response

The Madras High Court on Wednesday accepted exception to a request made by a counsel for the Union of India to provide more time to finish its response to petitions questioning the legality of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (IT Rules, 2021). In its interim order, the Court continued to ask the Additional Solicitor General of India to acknowledge why proper steps should not be exercised against those accountable for not filing the counter-affidavit on behalf of the Union of India, notwithstanding prior directions from the Court to do so.

Another counsel appearing for the Central government today requested the Court to allow some more time to file its answer after a counsel for the petitioner notified that the Union of India was yet to file its counter.

JOIN US ON TELEGRAM

“What is this,” Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee remarked, reporting that the Union had asked time to file its response on the last date of hearing as well.

The Court, though, continued to dismiss the matter till Friday, while continuing in its order that the ASG should respond on why action should not be taken against those persons who failed to file a timely response.

Spread the love
Legal News Tags:[Challenge to IT Rules 2021] "What is this:" Madras High Court pulls up Central govt for delay in filing the response

Post navigation

Previous Post: Project Lion: Gujarat seeks Rs. 2,000 crores from Central Government
Next Post: “You make laws instantly, you can rush through the impact of laws too:” SC grants Central govt 4 weeks to consider impact of Consumer Protection Act 2019

Related Posts

  • Bombay HC Stays Two Provisions of IT Rules, Says They Prima Facie Violate Freedom of Speech Legal News
  • Security should not be provided merely to enhance one’s status: Allahabad High Court Legal News
  • Lockdown Violation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Refuses To Quash FIR U/S 188 IPC; Says S. 195 CrPC Not A Bar On Police Investigation Legal News
  • A cow should be named as National Animal: Allahabad High Court Legal News
  • Drones not permitted to fly within 25km of international borders including LOC, LAC: Civil Aviation Ministry Legal News
  • Hijab Ban Constitutional! Says High Court. Legal News

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

June 2022
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« May    
subscribeSubscribe to my channel
«
Prev
1
/
3
Next
»
loading
play
Honorable High Court of Karnataka verdict on HIJAB issue. #viral #shorts #judiciary #law #caselaws
play
Section 6 of Indian evidence act concept based question Res Gestae #shorts #viral #youtubeshorts
play
Difference between rule of relevancy and rule of admissibility. understand the difference in 1 min.
play
can a examination of witnesses be done through video conferencing? #viral #youtubeshorts
play
Last Seen Theory under Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Understand the concept in 27 seconds!
play
Concept of Successive Bail. #viral #caselaws #judiciary #law #pcsj #legalknowledge
«
Prev
1
/
3
Next
»
loading

  • Current Affairs Quiz: 12 August 2021 Current Affairs
  • United Kingdom’s Sanctions – A Nightmare To Immigrants Research paper
  • ISRO’s Earth Observation Satellite fails to reach orbit due to ‘technical anomaly’ Current Affairs
  • Investor Summit 2021: PM Modi starts National Automobile Scrappage Policy Call for Blogs
  • Reservation in India: 105th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2021 studied along with 102nd Amendment Act, 2018 and Maratha Judgement, 2021 Articles
  • ANALYSIS OF MOTOR LAWS IN INDIA Articles
  • Wimbledon Junior Men’s title goes to Samir Banerjee Current Affairs
  • In a rare move, Election Commission pushes Punjab polls to Feb 20: Know the reason! News

Recent Posts

  • ANALYSIS OF MOTOR LAWS IN INDIA
  • SECULARISM IN INDIA – BINARY EFFECT WITH JUDICIARY & CONSTITUTION
  • SCHOOLS OF CRIMINOLOGY
  • CASE ANALYSIS: U. UNICHOYI AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF KERALA
  • RUSSIA-UKRAINE CONFLICT – WHAT IT SIGNIFIES FOR TAIWAN’S FUTURE

About us

  • About us.
  • Contact
  • Current Affairs
  • Editorial Board Page
  • Editorial Board Profile
  • Legal Articles
  • Legal Maxim
  • Legal News
  • News
  • Official Legalonus WhatsApp Group “Legalonus Community” join now!
  • Profile
  • Volume I Issue I (2022)

Choose Language

en English
ar Arabicbn Bengalizh-CN Chinese (Simplified)cs Czechda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfr Frenchde Germangu Gujaratihi Hindiit Italianla Latinmr Marathine Nepalipt Portuguesepa Punjabiru Russiansd Sindhies Spanish

Copyright © 2022 Legalonus.

Powered by PressBook News WordPress theme