Site icon LegalOnus

Emergency Provisions – Short notes (Articles 352 to 360)

ChatGPT Image Jan 19, 2026, 10_29_44 PM
Spread the love

Shivani Gupta is a 4th year BA LLB student at Sinhgad Law College, Pune. Read More


Abstract

The Indian Constitution’s emergency provisions, contained in Articles 352 to 360, grant the Union Government broad authority to address unusual circumstances that threaten the nation’s security, financial stability, or constitutional integrity. These clauses give the president the authority to declare three separate kinds of emergencies, each with its own set of justifications and legal ramifications: financial, state and national emergencies (President’s Rule). However, these powers are not unchecked; the parliament must follow specific procedures to approve and maintain them. This essay examines the constitutional justification for declaring emergencies, the procedures for extending them, and their significant impacts on India’s federalism, basic rights, and democratic governance.

Introduction

The Indian Constitution’s founders included emergency provisions to protect the country’s integrity and sovereignty in times of serious crisis, taking into account both domestic and international experiences. Three categories of emergencies are covered by the Constitution:

  1. National Emergency (Article 352)- due to war, external aggression, or armed rebellion.
  2. President’s Rule (Article 356)- due to the failure of constitutional machinery in a state.
  3. Financial Emergency (Article 360)- due to financial instability or a threat to the financial credit of India.

By limiting state autonomy and consolidating authority in the Union Government, these rules fundamentally change the federal structure. They also affect how civil liberties and democratic institutions operate.

National Emergency (Article 352)

Grounds for Proclamation:

  1. War
  2. External aggression
  3. Armed rebellion (Earlier it was “internal disturbance”- changed by the 44th Amendment Act

Procedure for Proclamation:

The President can proclaim an emergency only on the written advice of the Council of Ministers.

Both Houses of Parliament must concur on such a proclamation:

Effects of National Emergency:

  1. Extension of central authority over states: The federal system momentarily adopts a unitary form.
  2. Parliament has the authority to prolong the life of the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies, one year at a time, but no more than six months after the end of the emergency.
  3. During an emergency brought on by war or external attack, Article 19’s fundamental rights are immediately suspended (although not in the event of an armed insurrection).
  4. Article 359 gives the president the authority to halt the implementation of other fundamental rights, with the exception of Article 20 and 21.

President’s Rule (Article 356)-

Grounds for proclamation

Procedure for proclamation

       Within 2 months from the date of issuance

       By a simple majority of members present and voting

Effect of State Governance

The state government is overthrown and the President takes over under the President’s Rule (Article 356), with the Governor running the state on behalf of the Union Government.

Parliament creates legislation for the state during this time, and the state legislative assembly is either suspended or dissolved. The rule is susceptible to court review, and the judiciary is unaffected.

Financial Emergency (Article 360)

Features

Effects of Financial Emergency

The Centre has the authority to advise states on financial issues, such as lowering pay and benefits for:

The President may need to approve state financial decisions and money bills.

Suspension of Fundamental Rights (Articles 358–359)

Article 358 – Suspension of Article 19
Article 359 – Suspension of Enforcement of Fundamental Rights

Conclusion

There are two sides to India’s regulations for announcing a national emergency. They have the potential to be abused and to undermine democratic principles, even as they give the central government the authority it needs to protect the country in times of emergency. Maintaining constitutional protections while facilitating efficient crisis response is still a difficult task. In order to preserve India’s democratic fabric as it negotiates changing security challenges and political dynamics, it is crucial that the emergency measures be used sparingly, under strict supervision, and in accordance with the law.


Spread the love
Exit mobile version