Skip to content
Legalonus

Legalonus

Acpuitas sequitur legam

  • Current Affairs
  • Legal Articles
  • Legal Maxim
  • Legal News
  • News
  • About us.
  • Call for Blogs
  • Official Legalonus WhatsApp Group “Legalonus Community” join now!
  • Editorial Board Page
  • Editorial Board Profile
  • Profile
  • Volume I Issue I (2022)
  • en English
    ar Arabicbn Bengalizh-CN Chinese (Simplified)cs Czechda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfr Frenchde Germangu Gujaratihi Hindiit Italianla Latinmr Marathine Nepalipt Portuguesepa Punjabiru Russiansd Sindhies Spanish
  • Toggle search form
  • HC of Madras strikes down the Amendment Banning Poker, Rummy Games by Tamil Nadu Legal News
  • Bharat Dynamics Ltd approves Rs 499-crore deal with Indian Air Force Current Affairs
  • Abrogation of Article 370 and 35A Articles
  • DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COPYRIGHT CLAIM & COPYRIGHT STRIKE Articles
  • India’s 1st women-owned industrial park opens in Hyderabad Current Affairs
  • MARITAL RAPE OF MINOR WIFE- UNDERSTAND THE LEGALITY WITH CASE LAWS! Articles
  • Role Of Governor in Consolidating Federalism Articles
  • MAINTENANCE RIGHTS OF WOMEN UNDER HINDU LAW Articles

Quasi-Judicial Powers Can’t Be Delegated; One Who Decides Must Hear: Karnataka High Court

Posted on August 10, 2021August 10, 2021 By Ayush No Comments on Quasi-Judicial Powers Can’t Be Delegated; One Who Decides Must Hear: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has given the decision that the Commissioner of Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) also maintains quasi-judicial authorities and is authorised to arbitrate upon the rights of the parties, can only use those powers himself and cannot transfer it to any other authority.
Justice M Nagaprasanna while determining a petition filed by one Chitrakala said,

“Manifold powers, duties and obligations are determined upon the Commissioner in words of the Act, a few of them are quasi-judicial in character as the Commissioner is authorised to settle upon the rights of the parties. Adjudication upon the rights of the parties cannot but be a power that is quasi-judicial in nature. Accordingly, quasi-judicial power will have to be executed only by such an officer who is authorised to practice and not by any other authority.”


Case Title: Chitrakala v. State of Karnataka Case No: Writ Petition No.14459/2019
Date of Order: 28th Day of July 2021

JOIN US ON TELEGRAM

Coram: Justice M. Nagaprasanna

bbmp-commissioner-quasi-judicial-power-not-to-be-delegated-he-who-decides-must-hear-2watermark-398247Download
Spread the love
Legal News Tags:Quasi-Judicial Powers Can't Be Delegated; One Who Decides Must Hear: Karnataka High Court

Post navigation

Previous Post: Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Can Be Registered Through Video-Conferencing: Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment
Next Post: Does Oral Exchange Of Land In Rural Punjab Require Compulsory Registration? Supreme Court Issues Notice

Related Posts

  • Anti-muslim slogans: Delhi Court gives four including Ashwini Upadhyay 2-day judicial custody, two others remanded to one-day police custody Legal News
  • Police questioning school kids in sedition case violated rights: K’taka HC Legal News
  • Parliament passes Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Bill, 2021 – All you need to know Current Affairs
  • Lok Sabha announces General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Amendment Bill, 2021: All you need to know Legal News
  • HC of Madras strikes down the Amendment Banning Poker, Rummy Games by Tamil Nadu Legal News
  • Judge Uttam Anand’s Killing: CBI’s Report Does Not Indicate Anything On Motive, Says Supreme Court [Recent update] Legal News

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

June 2022
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« May    
subscribeSubscribe to my channel
«
Prev
1
/
3
Next
»
loading
play
Honorable High Court of Karnataka verdict on HIJAB issue. #viral #shorts #judiciary #law #caselaws
play
Section 6 of Indian evidence act concept based question Res Gestae #shorts #viral #youtubeshorts
play
Difference between rule of relevancy and rule of admissibility. understand the difference in 1 min.
play
can a examination of witnesses be done through video conferencing? #viral #youtubeshorts
play
Last Seen Theory under Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Understand the concept in 27 seconds!
play
Concept of Successive Bail. #viral #caselaws #judiciary #law #pcsj #legalknowledge
«
Prev
1
/
3
Next
»
loading

  • ACCESS TO JUSTICE DURING LOCKDOWN Articles
  • CAPITAL PUNISHMENT REFORMING OR INCITING THE CRIMINALS Articles
  • India’s total established renewable energy capacity passes 100 GigaWatts Current Affairs
  • SHOULD MARITAL RAPE BE CRIMINALISED OR NOT? Articles
  • Anticipatory breach of contract and actual breach of contract Articles
  • Contract of bailment – An in-depth analysis Articles
  • India’s Anti-Drug law (NDPS ACT) Articles
  • Culpae Paena Par esto Legal Maxim

Recent Posts

  • ANALYSIS OF MOTOR LAWS IN INDIA
  • SECULARISM IN INDIA – BINARY EFFECT WITH JUDICIARY & CONSTITUTION
  • SCHOOLS OF CRIMINOLOGY
  • CASE ANALYSIS: U. UNICHOYI AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF KERALA
  • RUSSIA-UKRAINE CONFLICT – WHAT IT SIGNIFIES FOR TAIWAN’S FUTURE

About us

  • About us.
  • Contact
  • Current Affairs
  • Editorial Board Page
  • Editorial Board Profile
  • Legal Articles
  • Legal Maxim
  • Legal News
  • News
  • Official Legalonus WhatsApp Group “Legalonus Community” join now!
  • Profile
  • Volume I Issue I (2022)

Choose Language

en English
ar Arabicbn Bengalizh-CN Chinese (Simplified)cs Czechda Danishnl Dutchen Englishfr Frenchde Germangu Gujaratihi Hindiit Italianla Latinmr Marathine Nepalipt Portuguesepa Punjabiru Russiansd Sindhies Spanish

Copyright © 2022 Legalonus.

Powered by PressBook News WordPress theme